Check DNA of your children at birth?

[Fred75]

yeah .... it seems that there are crazy levels of adultery and children not belonging. i think dna testing should be routine at birth, if only for the childs sake.

I dont think I like this at all but unfortunately the way society is I can see why this may become needed. Maybe I am deluding myself but surely this was not the case a few decades ago.

True.
I found another good DNA site for paternity testing...

www.Women-R-Run-Around-Sluts.com

[Cambridge]

I dont think I like this at all but unfortunately the way society is I can see why this may become needed. Maybe I am deluding myself but surely this was not the case a few decades ago.

Why do you say that? What intervening factor do you speculate caused this to be the case today, but not yesterday? In the absence of any proof to the contrary, I would believe that it’s always been the case.

[Fred75]

I dont think I like this at all but unfortunately the way society is I can see why this may become needed. Maybe I am deluding myself but surely this was not the case a few decades ago.

Why do you say that? What intervening factor do you speculate caused this to be the case today, but not yesterday? In the absence of any proof to the contrary, I would believe that it’s always been the case.

1) Morals no longer taught in school.
2) Feminists telling women they can sleep around like men.
3) Liberal society promoting promiscuity.
4) Divorce 50 years ago was unheard of. People were widows then. Not divorced.

[coolman]

3) Liberal society promoting promiscuity.

yep. Promiscuous girls is a good thing.

[honbuns]

2) Feminists telling women they can sleep around like men.

Errm, so are you condoning men sleeping around but not women, men are equally as guilty as women of being proimiscuity surely?

[coolman]

2) Feminists telling women they can sleep around like men.

Errm, so are you condoning men sleeping around but not women, men are equally as guilty as women of being proimiscuity surely?

I know Fred's answer to that one.

But MEN don't destroy a household by getting pregnant and fooling their husbands into thinking it is THEIRS!!!! Only SLUTTY WOMEN can do that!!! And they are STUPID if they do it for FREE. Putting hard working streetwalker out of an honest living!

ARE YOU A HATER?

[Fred75]

2) Feminists telling women they can sleep around like men.

Errm, so are you condoning men sleeping around but not women, men are equally as guilty as women of being proimiscuity surely?

No.
Because the only equalizer for women to have sex without consequences is abortion.

And women having abortions only teaches society that life has less value.

[Fred75]

2) Feminists telling women they can sleep around like men.

Errm, so are you condoning men sleeping around but not women, men are equally as guilty as women of being proimiscuity surely?

I know Fred's answer to that one.

But MEN don't destroy a household by getting pregnant and fooling their husbands into thinking it is THEIRS!!!! Only SLUTTY WOMEN can do that!!! And they are STUPID if they do it for FREE. Putting hard working s

Good job.

[coolman]

2) Feminists telling women they can sleep around like men.

Errm, so are you condoning men sleeping around but not women, men are equally as guilty as women of being proimiscuity surely?

I know Fred's answer to that one.

But MEN don't destroy a household by getting pregnant and fooling their husbands into thinking it is THEIRS!!!! Only SLUTTY WOMEN can do that!!! And they are STUPID if they do it for FREE. Putting hard working s

Good job.

thank you.

[Mr A]

I think Fred is living in the wrong century.
think about it, 100 years ago he would have fitted right in with his views

[honbuns]

Should have seen that one comming. *Hangs head in shame*

[mike p]

dont just say things like that please mr a, explain your views.

why do you think this ? i dont understand .....

[jinjin]

I am all for DNA testing. If the husband is not the father old the child then he should be permitted to divorce and not be held accountable for supporting the child. It takes two to cheat. If one is going to use traditional values then there is a man who is equally accountable for the dissolution of a marriage. That man, the real father, should be supporting the child.

"Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house; thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his man-servant, nor his maid-servant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's." -Exodus 20:17

[Verve]

Even with today's technology men are still trusting of their wives. They would rather not upset their partner by insinuating anything. Plus it's still the law that even if you have a child in your marriage and it's not yours legally you are responsible. Someone said they changed that law can't remember who.

[sugar&spice]

I really don't get women who would have babies with other men and let their husbands/partners think it's theirs. I really do think it's disgusting.

I for one, couldn't imagine creating a new life with someone I didn't love and who I knew truely loves me back and would be there.

I don't understand how those women think they have the right to mess with both their partners and their children's lives like that. If my mum turned round to me and said that my dad wasn't my dad, I would be devestated.