Still waiting for those credible citations.....
Or do you expect us to just take your word for it, because you heard about it through a friend of a friend that heard a caller on the radio talking about something he/she saw on tv?
Hahaha stuck for words are we??
No one is going to listen to a word you say when you cannot address anything that challenges your argument with any logical reply.
As as you’re your second empty statement, which point do you claim I have fabricated? Please, be specific instead of being so broad, or no one will take you seriously.
You cannot prove 9/11 happened the way the U.S. Government says it happened any more than I can prove it didn't.
But as it is the official position of the U.S. Government, which you support and defend and which the Government expects everyone to believe and accept as true, then it is your burden to prove the official Bush narrative of what happened leading up to 9/11, including 9/11, and in the days, weeks and months after 9/11.
If material aspects of the official 9/11 narrative are patently inconsistent or contradictory and/or unsupported by evidence and/or inconsistent with or contrary to known evidence, then the narrative will be discredited or at the very least not established, and you will be in no better position than you claim I'm in.
Still waiting for those credible citations.....
Or do you expect us to just take your word for it, because you heard about it through a friend of a friend that heard a caller on the radio talking about something he/she saw on tv?
Thought so.
"The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is."
Hahaha stuck for words are we??
No one is going to listen to a word you say when you cannot address anything that challenges your argument with any logical reply.
As as you’re your second empty statement, which point do you claim I have fabricated? Please, be specific instead of being so broad, or no one will take you seriously.
You cannot prove 9/11 happened the way the U.S. Government says it happened any more than I can prove it didn't.
But as it is the official position of the U.S. Government, which you support and defend and which the Government expects everyone to believe and accept as true, then it is your burden to prove the official Bush narrative of what happened leading up to 9/11, including 9/11, and in the days, weeks and months after 9/11.
If material aspects of the official 9/11 narrative are patently inconsistent or contradictory and/or unsupported by evidence and/or inconsistent with or contrary to known evidence, then the narrative will be discredited or at the very least not established, and you will be in no better position than you claim I'm in.
I do not need to prove anything.
Why do you feel that you do? I accept the official version, yes, as any other version is based on nothing but speculation. Other versions can also be defeated with simple common sense.
Bin Laden went on tv and claimed responsibility... do you forget that? Oh... right... Now you are going to make the claim that Bush told Bin Laden what to say... right?
You will also say that the sep 11 commission were biased, although the commission was made up of 5 republicans and 5 democrats.
The republicans tried to impeach Clinton over a sex scandal... don't you think that if there was any truth behind Bush organising sep 11 that the Democrats might just use it to impeach him?
I don't see Bill Clinton or John Kerry standing up saying that Bush or the republicans were behind 9/11. Don't you think that they would say so if it were true? After all, it would be the most devistating political weapon available!
But of course you, a simpleton, claims to have classified information and superior knowledge of the US government and Sep 11 etc etc. Oh, greatful one, please enlighten us.. I think it is YOU who claims to be Illuminati!!!
Now back to the point... You have tried to use 9/11 to deflect from the original topic, and to try to fool people into think you have answered my questions and provided the citations that I requested you provide to support your statements... but You have not done either. Can I expect an intelligent reply/facts soon, or are you going to keep on using wild unfounded accusations as a tool to avoid answering me?
Hahaha stuck for words are we??
No one is going to listen to a word you say when you cannot address anything that challenges your argument with any logical reply.
As as you’re your second empty statement, which point do you claim I have fabricated? Please, be specific instead of being so broad, or no one will take you seriously.
You cannot prove 9/11 happened the way the U.S. Government says it happened any more than I can prove it didn't.
But as it is the official position of the U.S. Government, which you support and defend and which the Government expects everyone to believe and accept as true, then it is your burden to prove the official Bush narrative of what happened leading up to 9/11, including 9/11, and in the days, weeks and months after 9/11.
If material aspects of the official 9/11 narrative are patently inconsistent or contradictory and/or unsupported by evidence and/or inconsistent with or contrary to known evidence, then the narrative will be discredited or at the very least not established, and you will be in no better position than you claim I'm in.
I do not need to prove anything.
Why do you feel that you do? I accept the official version, yes, as any other version is based on nothing but speculation. Other versions can also be defeated with simple common sense.
Bin Laden went on tv and claimed responsibility... do you forget that? Oh... right... Now you are going to make the claim that Bush told Bin Laden what to say... right?
You will also say that the sep 11 commission were biased, although the commission was made up of 5 republicans and 5 democrats.
The republicans tried to impeach Clinton over a sex scandal... don't you think that if there was any truth behind Bush organising sep 11 that the Democrats might just use it to impeach him?
I don't see Bill Clinton or John Kerry standing up saying that Bush or the republicans were behind 9/11. Don't you think that they would say so if it were true? After all, it would be the most devistating political weapon available!
But of course you, a simpleton, claims to have classified information and superior knowledge of the US government and Sep 11 etc etc. Oh, greatful one, please enlighten us.. I think it is YOU who claims to be Illuminati!!!
Now back to the point... You have tried to use 9/11 to deflect from the original topic, and to try to fool people into think you have answered my questions and provided the citations that I requested you provide to support your statements... but You have not done either. Can I expect an intelligent reply/facts soon, or are you going to keep on using wild unfounded accusations as a tool to avoid answering me?
You are an immodest person with much to be modest about.
You use many words to say nothing.
I never suggested I am Illuminati; I said that the leaders of the major countries in the world have been, and are presently, Illuminati.
......More of the same from you, as expected.
Who cares what you say if you cannot back it up with anything!
When you have something useful to say, we might pay attention. Until then, I suggest you get the facts for yourself, instead of just repeating someone elses ignorant opinion without knowing why.
......More of the same from you, as expected.
Who cares what you say if you cannot back it up with anything!
When you have something useful to say, we might pay attention. Until then, I suggest you get the facts for yourself, instead of just repeating someone elses ignorant opinion without knowing why.
Another excuse? If I were insignificant, why would you waste so much time replying? I am only insignificant when it suits you, and it suits you now, because you have no intelligent reply... have to get out of replying somehow don't you... so why not call me insignificant to try to hide the fact that you have nothing worth saying?
......More of the same from you, as expected.
Who cares what you say if you cannot back it up with anything!
When you have something useful to say, we might pay attention. Until then, I suggest you get the facts for yourself, instead of just repeating someone elses ignorant opinion without knowing why.
you are insignificant
DON'T BE STRESSED, YOU WILL GROW OUT OF YOUR IMMATURITY. IGNORANCE HOWEVER....
Another excuse? If I were insignificant, why would you waste so much time replying? I am only insignificant when it suits you, and it suits you now, because you have no intelligent reply... have to get out of replying somehow don't you... so why not call me insignificant to try to hide the fact that you have nothing worth saying?
I haven't wasted but a minute or two.
You're the one with the lengthy but vacuous posts.
Bin Laden did al quaeda cos he wanted t attack the west who was better than him. anyone says different is a commie or a crack pot who wants to hate U.S. gov for things it didn't do. so err... what next? black helicopters? bush is a reptilian alien with ESP? like err...
Hahaha stuck for words are we??
No one is going to listen to a word you say when you cannot address anything that challenges your argument with any logical reply.
As as you’re your second empty statement, which point do you claim I have fabricated? Please, be specific instead of being so broad, or no one will take you seriously.
You cannot prove 9/11 happened the way the U.S. Government says it happened any more than I can prove it didn't.
But as it is the official position of the U.S. Government, which you support and defend and which the Government expects everyone to believe and accept as true, then it is your burden to prove the official Bush narrative of what happened leading up to 9/11, including 9/11, and in the days, weeks and months after 9/11.
If material aspects of the official 9/11 narrative are patently inconsistent or contradictory and/or unsupported by evidence and/or inconsistent with or contrary to known evidence, then the narrative will be discredited or at the very least not established, and you will be in no better position than you claim I'm in.
I do not need to prove anything.
Why do you feel that you do? I accept the official version, yes, as any other version is based on nothing but speculation. Other versions can also be defeated with simple common sense.
Bin Laden went on tv and claimed responsibility... do you forget that? Oh... right... Now you are going to make the claim that Bush told Bin Laden what to say... right?
You will also say that the sep 11 commission were biased, although the commission was made up of 5 republicans and 5 democrats.
The republicans tried to impeach Clinton over a sex scandal... don't you think that if there was any truth behind Bush organising sep 11 that the Democrats might just use it to impeach him?
I don't see Bill Clinton or John Kerry standing up saying that Bush or the republicans were behind 9/11. Don't you think that they would say so if it were true? After all, it would be the most devistating political weapon available!
But of course you, a simpleton, claims to have classified information and superior knowledge of the US government and Sep 11 etc etc. Oh, greatful one, please enlighten us.. I think it is YOU who claims to be Illuminati!!!
Now back to the point... You have tried to use 9/11 to deflect from the original topic, and to try to fool people into think you have answered my questions and provided the citations that I requested you provide to support your statements... but You have not done either. Can I expect an intelligent reply/facts soon, or are you going to keep on using wild unfounded accusations as a tool to avoid answering me?
I cant believe how naive you are. It just goes to show how ignorant some people are about the facts. If you did your research you would be astonished at the lies and bullshit you've been fed. Thats propaganda for you
Bin Laden did al quaeda cos he wanted t attack the west who was better than him. anyone says different is a commie or a crack pot who wants to hate U.S. gov for things it didn't do. so err... what next? black helicopters? bush is a reptilian alien with ESP? like err...
no.
How convinient that you immediatley jump onto this reptilian fantasy. We'd all love it if Bush were an alien with scales and a tail, but he's not, he's just an ordinary red neck yokel from yokel ville, living in his ranch with a lassoo and budwiser, swinging on his hammock.
Another excuse? If I were insignificant, why would you waste so much time replying? I am only insignificant when it suits you, and it suits you now, because you have no intelligent reply... have to get out of replying somehow don't you... so why not call me insignificant to try to hide the fact that you have nothing worth saying?
You never refuted the allegations of corruption and money laundering through offshore bank accounts in the names of dummy corporations.
Another excuse? If I were insignificant, why would you waste so much time replying? I am only insignificant when it suits you, and it suits you now, because you have no intelligent reply... have to get out of replying somehow don't you... so why not call me insignificant to try to hide the fact that you have nothing worth saying?
You never refuted the allegations of corruption and money laundering through offshore bank accounts in the names of dummy corporations.
Site Map
FAQ
Usergroups
Search
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Register
My Profile Space
